Supreme Court Case Research
CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY RESEARCH
Dr. Wilson A.P. U.S. History
The Constitution and the Bill of Rights are considered living documents in our history. They are “alive” because the Supreme Court constantly reinterprets them. In this research project, you will study one pivotal Supreme Court case of your choice and interpret its significance in U.S. Constitutional History. In this paper you will address two questions:
1. Was this a strict or loose construction decision?
2. Did the Supreme Court make a good decision from your point of view?
____1. Choose a case:___________________________Date of Decision___ Write one paragraph telling why it is of interest to you.
____2. What is the case about from the point of view of the petitioner? What were the circumstances and what was its previous court history? Day 1
____3. What is the constitutional question? What section of the Constitution did the Supreme Court refer to in its decision? Day 2
____4. Put your topic in the context of the time in which the decision was made. Is the court liberal or conservative? Loose or strict construction? Read Kezirian 249-256 “The Supreme Court: Insights from History.” Answer this on the blog. Day 2
____5. What were the vote and the decision? Who wrote the decision and what arguments did those who wrote the decision and those who were opposed make? Was it a loose or strict interpretation of the Constitution? Was it liberal or conservative within the context of the times? Day 3
____6. What other cases were decided on this same topic? Did your case overturn another? Has your decision been overturned? Day 3
____7. Conclusion: Was this decision a “good” interpretation of the Constitution in your opinion? What has it meant for the American people? Day 4
____8. Now go back and write a thesis paragraph which includes case, date, issue, whether this decision is loose or strict construction, and whether you consider it to be a good or bad decision and why.
Your paper should be 2 pages in length single-spaced (about 1000 words). You need both footnotes and bibliography. If you would like me to read a rough draft, you must have it to me by Oct 20.
The due date is Monday, October 24.
Please also check the following websites for more choices:
//supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/cases/topic.htm AND
Yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/avalon.htm
http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/supreme.html ; http://www.landmarkcases.org/
www.lectlaw.com/tcas.htm
Important Court Cases
18th century
1. Chisholm v. Georgia 1793
19th century
2. Marbury v. Madison 1803 judicial review
3. Peck – 1810 – feds find state law unconstitutional
4. Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee 1816
5. McCulloch v. Maryland 1819 commerce
6. Gibbons v. Ogden 1824 mono poly DAVID G,
7. Worcester v. Georgia 1832 Trail of Tears
8. Dred Scott v. Sandford 1857 black citizenship
9. Ex Parte Milligan 1866 – Lincoln violated Constitution MUHAMMAD
10. Bradwell v. Illinois 1873 – can a woman be a lawyer?
11. Wabash v. Illinois 1886 monopoly
12. Plessy v. Ferguson 1896 segregation MATT
20th century
13. Northern Securities Company v. US 1904
14. Muller v. Oregon 1908 women’s rights KATE
15. Hammer v. Dagerheart 1918 – child labor constitutional COLLEEN
16. Abrams v. US 1919 free speech TEDDY M
17. Schenck v. United States 1919 free speech LUKE
18. Adkins v. Children’s Hospital – 1923 – women don’t need protection CHLOE
19. Meyer v. Nebraska 1923 – Latino Rights JUAN, MICHELLE
20. Norris v. Alabama 1935 Scottsboro boys
21. Schecter Poultry Corporation v. United States 1935 New Deal
22. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones and Laughlin Steel Corp 1937
23. Darby Lumber Co. v. US 1941 – upholds Fair Labor Standards Act
24. Wickard v. Filburn 1942
25. Korematsu v. US 1944 Japanese internment JACOB D, ELMEDIN
26. Morgan v. Virginia 1946
27. Sweatt v. Painter 1950 integration
28. Brown V. Board 1954 school integration CALLAN
29. Cooper v. Aaron 1958 school integration
30. Mapp v. Ohio 1961 – obscene materials
31. Baker v. Carr 1962 – electoral apportionment
32. Engel v. Vitale 1962 – school prayer
33. Gideon v. Wainwright 1963 right to a lawyer SAM
34. NY Times v. Sullivan 1964 free press and segregation MIKE,
35. Escobedo v. Illinois 1964 rights of accused
36. Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. US 1964 – private business and segregation
37. Griswold v. Connecticut 1965 right to birth control CHRIS
38. Abington School District v. Schempp 1963
39. Miranda v. Arizona 1966 accused rights
40. Loving v. Virginia 1967 interracial marriage CARA
41. Reed v. Reed – 1971 equal protection protects women
42. Swann v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Board of Ed 1971 – busing
43. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. 1971 – employment equality
44. Roe v. Wade 1973 abortion MARK, VICKY
45. Milliken v. Bradley 1974 – no school busing across city lines
47. Craig v. Boren (1976) discrimination on the basis of sex
48. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke 1978 affirmative action CHRISTIAN
49. Cannon v. University of Chicago 1979 – enforcing Title IX CHARLOTTE, CHRIS
50. Harris v. McCrae 1980 – no federal funding of abortions SIENNA, CHRIS
51. Bowers v. Hardwick 1986 sodomy is a crime
52. Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protection 1988 – Indian rights MILO
53. United States v. Virginia (1996) – male only admissions at
54. Bush v. Gore 2000 election TESS, CAROLINE
55. Jones v. Alfred H. Mayer Co. – bans racial discrimination in housing
56. Lawrence v. Texas – anti-sodomy laws unconstitutional
57. Grutter v. Bollinger – law school admissions
58 us v nixon shannon JUSTIN, EMILY
There are many others you could choose as well – you can choose another on a topic of your choice as long as you check with the teacher.
/supct.law.cornell.edu/supct/cases/topic.htm AND
Yale.edu/lawweb/avalon/avalon.htm
http://www.findlaw.com/casecode/supreme.html ; http://www.landmarkcases.org/
www.lectlaw.com/tcas.htm
